Mediocre at Best

Compared to the NY Times, the DC Post and the WSJ this website is really poor. Poor layout, poor organization and poor material (I.e., poorly written). All in all a great disappointment.

And then, as others have said, a memory hog. Since the Times future lies in the web, youd think management would pay more attention. Oh well...

Luddite Lennie about LA Times, v3.7.1